Divergent Paths: The Academy and the Judiciary
Product Description
Divergent Paths: The Academy and the Judiciary
Judges and legal scholars talk past one another, if they have any conversation at all. Academics criticize judicial decisions in theoretical terms, which leads many judges to dismiss academic discourse as divorced from reality. Richard Posner reflects on the causes and consequences of this widening gap and what can be done to close it.
Technical Specifications
You might also like
Richard Posner
How Judges Think (Pims - Polity Immigration and Society Series)
The Future of Law and Economics: Essays in Reform and Recollection
Reflections on Judging
Dissent and the Supreme Court: Its Role in the Court's History and the Nation's Constitutional Dialogue
Law’s Abnegation
The Rise and Fall of American Growth: The U.S. Standard of Living since the Civil War (The Princeton Economic History of the Western World)
Louis D. Brandeis: American Prophet (Jewish Lives)
The Burger Court and the Rise of the Judicial Right